Mobile Ads in Social Marketing

 

webster headshot 2Many consumers see mobile advertising as nothing more than an annoyance – irritating interruptions that appear as they scroll through their Huffington Post app or disturb their game of Sudoku. Webster Lewin knows we can change that. As the former Director of Mobility at Starcom MediaVest Group, Lewin believes mobile ads are not only useful, but can and should become the primary focus in social marketing planning of the future.

Getting those flashy banners to attract rather than deter consumers will require smarter use of customer data. With more than 15 years in the business to back him up, Lewin can be confident in calling out creativity and relevancy as the two major keys for creating more successful mobile advertising campaigns. He let me in on some of his ideas for improving the way we approach mobile ads:

Drew:  You provided a couple of examples of “great mobile ads we haven’t seen.”  For the purposes of my blog, can you provide a mini-summary of one of the cases and share why you think it was so effective?

I am highlighting two mobile campaigns that I really liked for different reasons (and wish that I had done). The first is one currently running on the iAd network for GIECO called the Money Badger. To me it represents the height of production value of any mobile display unit I’ve seen to date. The team at CDG Interactive used stop motion photography to create something that’s on par with a TV spot.

The other campaign that I really liked appeared on Mashable.com and was for Motorola’s Moto X smartphone. The ad, like Mashable’s website, uses  responsive web design to provide a seamless and compelling experience across a range of devices via a single ad and a single ad tag.

Drew: When you mention mobile advertising to people outside of the industry (i.e. normal people!), they roll their eyes in annoyance.  How do marketers make sure that mobile ads aren’t simply another source of disruption we all try to ignore or avoid altogether?

I think the keys are creativity and relevancy. So, agencies, publishers and brands need to keep pushing for better experiences. Also, as an industry we need to discourage the increasing use of deceptive mobile ads that try to trick users into tapping on them. They only exist because people focus way too much on CTR, and they will poison the well for everyone else.

Drew: Asked differently, what are three key components of a great mobile ad campaign?

Flawless execution from start to finish, targeting the right consumer at the right time in the right way, and offering something of value.

Drew:  It’s been the year of mobile for the last 10 years yet mobile still feels like a bit of an after thought for many brands.  First, why is it so important that marketers put mobile at the center of their planning process today?

Mobile is where the eyeballs are moving to, desktop usage is declining. Consumers are using mobile while they are shopping and while they consume other media, so figuring out how to use mobility in media plans is essential.

Drew:  Mobile at its best seems to be integrated with data (social, local, CRM) which then allows for a very personalized mobile experience. Can you each give me another example of a brand that is doing this well and what it took to get them there?  

I think that Samsung and Walmart, and some of the large CPG brands are really starting to make smart decisions about how to use location and past purchase data in targeting. Retailers are focusing on location data, both real-time and historical, to better target customers and potential customers. I’ve seen that I personally have been targeted by Samsung base on my actual location, around the launch of their Galaxy Gear smartwatch, and I ended up heading over to Times Square that day to check it out. CPG brands are less better positioned to leverage location data as their product are sold in so many places, but they can target using purchase history via Catalina and other data.

Drew:  You provided examples of mobile experiences when a person was indeed using a mobile device on the go. Seems like this is one aspect of mobile. The other aspect of mobile device usage is when we are stationary in the office or at home using a 2nd and 3rd screen. Should marketers look at these situations distinctly and create campaigns specific to that usage scenario? 

A lot of brands are now using various methods to target consumers when they are actually at home, using wifi IP addresses. Also, prime time TV viewers are being actively targeted now on Twitter, and Facebook via sponsored posts. If you are on Twitter during any major TV event, you’re certain to see ads that drive to mobile friendly experiences.

Drew:  You used the expression, “if it doesn’t work on mobile, don’t do it!” yet this is far from the reality.  What are problems that happen when marketers tack on a mobile campaign versus building all programs around it?

When the experience from start to finish isn’t fully planned out and tested on mobile, things inevitably fall apart. I can’t even begin to tell you how many mobile campaigns I see that don’t work the way they should. It’ really unfortunate, because many clients don’t realize that they are just creating a very bad impression of their brand.

Drew:   It seems like we won’t be distinguishing between mobile and stationary media consumption in the near future.  Assuming you agree with that scenario, how will this effect media planning/buying?  Will mobile still be its own thing?

Even when audiences are bought across multiple devices, the experience the consumer has with each of their devices is quite unique. So, I think that responsive ad units are one of the ways that marketers can ensure that they are efficiently reaching everyone, yet still providing an experience that is tailored to each device. Also, when it comes to rich media, there are some things that you can do in mobile that you just can’t on other devices, click-to-call for example.

Drew:  How do you see mobile evolving in the next 2-3 years?  What are the most exciting new or emerging trends leading edge marketers should be experimenting with now or really soon? 

I think targeting data and especially targeting based on location data will be the biggest ways that mobile ads will become more relevant. Also, mobile creative is just now coming into its own. As more digital creatives see mobile as their primary focus, we’ll start to see more really amazing campaigns.

 

 

Dr. Pepper Comes Up Roses

A couple of months ago, I had a conversation with Joan Voight for an OMMA article about a PR stunt by Dr. Pepper. The article just appeared in OMMA’s March 09 issue and is well worth reading. The basics gist is that Dr. Pepper promised a free soda to everyone in the U.S. if Guns N Roses ever finished their long awaited Chinese Democracy album (see AdAge). Well to make a long story short, GNR did release the album and Dr. Pepper did give away the soda  but all did not go according to plan.

Here are my rather extensive notes from my call with Joan which will make a lot more sense if you are familiar with the promotion already or read Joan’s article…

As far as I’m concerned, this is one of the best PR stunts of the decade. Most PR stunts have little connection to the brand essence and generate but one blip. This program, in contrast, has already generated 8 months worth of substantial press coverage that is consistent with the brand persona. DP at its best is a quirky individual with slightly offbeat tastes in soda and music. DP’s connection to offbeat music goes way back. DP’s connection to GNR is not forced. The brand people were true GNR fans. DP could act like a true GNR fan because they were GNR fans. The stunt reflected a true fans understanding of the bands 14-year struggle to get out a new album. The fact that the offer of free DP was not available to former GNR members, Slash and Buckethead, further demonstrated a true fans understanding and the quirky sense of humor that informed the whole effort.

The fact that their servers crashed and their toll-free number was swamped is further testament to the success of this PR grand slam. It seems that just about every media outlet covered the free DP offer back in March and then again in November when the album did come out. DP made the arrival of the long-awaited album more of an event that it might have been. DP cleverly inserted themselves into a bit of pop culture history. How amazing is that after making the announcement back in March, Axl Rose actually responded to a 2nd tier soda brand? When was the last time a pop culture icon engaged in a conversation with any brand for free? GNR had no problem with this stunt back in March. It seems clear they welcomed the support and appreciated the sense of humor behind the free soda offer. Only when DP couldn’t keep up with the demand for the free sodas did GNR express concern. GNR’s request for an apology from DP is yet another fortunate wrinkle in this stunt for DP. It simply extends the news value and gives DP another chance to engage in a public conversation with GNR. Now it is up to DP to capitalize on the situation with a tongue in cheek apology and perhaps another consumer offer that again would be carried by the media for free. I would think that another 24 hour window of free sodas should absolve them of any charges of over-promising.

From the beginning, this was a “win/win” situation for the brand. If the album didn’t launch, then DP got extraordinary press coverage that connected the brand with the plight of GNR fans all over the world. If the album did launch, then DP would have one of the most cost-effective sampling programs ever. As it turned out, DP delivered thousands and thousands of coupons at nominal cost. Ironically, the awareness and interest in the brand generated by this stunt is greater than any of DP’s recent advertising campaigns at a fraction of the cost. DP couldn’t have dreamed up a more cost effective sampling program.

This stunt is further support for the old credo the “all PR is good PR.” Ultimately people will remember that somehow DP was connected with a pop music happening. They will remember that DP is a true fan of GNR and has a quirky sense of humor. DP has tapped into something deep and would be smart to mine it for all its worth. Perhaps they can demonstrate this kind of insider music fan knowledge with another rock icon.

Sure some folks were peeved that they couldn’t get their free coupon and perhaps DP should have anticipated greater demand. DP responded by adding another 24-hour window which is probably more than most companies would have done. DP fans will not hold this against them. Non-DP fans might remain angry for awhile but that it is a small price to pay for such a salient PR bonanza.

Capturing email and addresses was another savvy move by DP. The recent Catalina Marketing study suggests that a very small percentage of users account for an inordinate share of consumption of any one brand. Having the email addresses of your heavy users is essential to efficient marketing. With all these names in a their database, DP now has the opportunity to isolate their heavy users from the riffraff who just wanted a free soda. Once they do that, they can have an on-going dialogue with their fans, pushing out content and offers that are both relevant and rewarding. DP generated this invaluable data base at a remarkably low cost thanks to all the free publicity which must be making the folks at Pepsi and Coke wishing they could “be a pepper too.”