Guerrilla Gone Bad

Photobucket - Video and Image HostingI really feel for Sam and his guerrilla gang at Interference. Their promotion for Cartoon Network has literally blown up in their face. If you haven’t heard about this fiasco yet, see the press clip below. You might wonder how an agency or a client could even consider placing suspicious looking devices all over big cities like Boston, NY and DC in the Post 9/11 world. As an agency that does lots of “guerrilla marketing”, it isn’t too hard for me to reconstruct the process. The client, Cartoon Network in this case, says we really want to get a lot of attention for our new show, noting how edgy the content is and how edgy the promotion should be. The agency, excited to be working with a client who is really willing to take risks and “push the envelope”, throws out a bunch of ideas including one that is truly outrageous, never imaging in a million years that the client would say yes. But the client, probably a young staffer, is anxious to create a huge “buzz” and get as much “free” publicity as they can, says “go for it, what’s the worst that could happen?” Everyone is swept up in the excitement of the idea, knowing without a doubt that this stunt won’t go unnoticed and the idea does not go through all the internal scrutiny and legal review process that more traditional ad campaigns typically face. A few weeks later the stunt is on the street and “kaboom”, a freelance street team operative is arrested, a major corporation is facing investigation from the Massachusetts Attorney General and a guerrilla agency is suddenly infamous.I have no doubt someone at Cartoon Network will lose their job over this one and frankly they probably should. The insensitivity of this stunt is simply astonishing. We all live in this world together and seeking attention by potentially scaring the snot out of someone is an act of self indulgent stupidity. Marketers need to accept responsibility for their actions and avoid “we win, somebody loses” scenarios. I’m coming down harder on the client because they asked for it, they approved it and they funded it. As for Interference, they are going to take in on the chin for this one and if they are lucky no one will go to jail. I’m all for risk taking but come on folks, grow up! There have got to be ways of getting attention without calling out the bomb squad.

Suspicious packages part of Turner Broadcasting marketing campaign

By Mac Daniel, John Ellement, and Andrew Ryan, Globe Staff

Turner Broadcasting acknowledged late this afternoon that the suspicious objects that ignited fears of bombs across Boston today were magnetic lights that were part of an outdoor marketing campaign for an adult cartoon.

Turner was promoting Adult Swim’s animated television show “Aqua Teen Hunger Force” in Boston and nine other cities, according to a statement e-mailed by Shirley Powell, a company spokeswoman.

Here’s a part of the Reuters story today on the subject with quotes from yours truly:

Still, while Turner Broadcasting may have successfully reached the audience of “Aqua Teen Hunger Force,” it likely faces a broader public relations headache, said Drew Neisser, the chief executive of Renegade Marketing Group.

“They got a lot of P.R.– but they are probably not happy on the corporate level,” said Neisser, who has overseen viral campaigns such as using an old checkered cab with HSBC’s logo to give free rides to the bank’s customers in New York.

“The question becomes in all this does the marketer have any responsibility to the world at large? Obviously my perspective is they do,” said Neisser. “You should be able to sell your products without making the world any worse.”

Wii is Simply Great

I was delighted to read in the New York Times this morning that “Nintendo’s Wii, Radiating Fun, is Eclipsing Sony.” I’ve talked about Wii before and how much fun it is to play. In fact, I played again with my son last weekend and it was a blast. It was about 20 degrees outside and there we were comfy cozy inside working up a sweat batting the tennis ball around like Roddick and Federer. (Much to my son’s frustration, because Wii doesn’t require a lot of button pushing, I am far more competitive in Wii games than the other gaming systems we own).

From a Marketing for Good standpoint, Wii represents a significant and welcome product enhancement. Instead of focusing on incremental graphic improvement and complicated game mechanics, Wii changed the way video games are played, turning them into a real athletic endeavor versus their more sedentary predecessors. If you buy a Wii, you might be surprised like I was at the fact that it doesn’t even have HD output (unlike every other game system sold including Nintendo’s own GameCube.) Essentially, Wii strips out all the unessential gaming elements and focuses on providing active entertainment as simply as possible. (On a side note, I honestly believe that Wii could become an effective weapon in the battle against childhood obesity. Nothing like getting kids off the couch for a few hours…)
Simplicity is not news for new product development but it sure is a smart tactic to remember especially in the technology arena. Google continues to rein supreme in the search world for many reasons but I’m convinced the primary one is that their search tool is so easy to use and their search words are so easy to buy. All the technology, the sophisticated algorithms are invisible to the end user, as they should be. Panasonic Toughbook computers continue to sell well based on a simple promise and product attribute–they are tough. Blackberry’s gained popularity because they did one thing well, mobile email (admittedly they’ve become more complicated and multi-functional since then but mobile email is still the reason for being). In technology, more can be less and less more. Plug and play shouldn’t be a pipe dream. Keep it Simple Sherlock need not be a cliche.

MFG is Contagious

Flipping through Business Week the other night, I was struck by the number of Marketing for Good initiatives out there. I will review two such efforts in this post, including ads from Home Depot and Honda. It seems “doing well by doing good” is contagious.

For example, a few months after Wal-Mart announced its massive Sustainability initiative, Home Depot has a print campaign featuring the headline, “What Do You Call a Year in Which You Sell 63 Million Earth-Friendly Products? A Good Start.” The ad goes on to detail Home Depot’s commitment to offering “customers a wide range of eco-savvy options.” The photo of the cute pigtailed little girl holding a compact fluorescent light bulb is actually quite eye-catching. For all I know, Home Depot started this campaign months ago and, frankly, I don’t really care if it simply an effort to “keep up with the Waltons”. The point is, Home Depot sells a lot of stuff that ends up in a lot of homes and if they, too, push environmentally friendly light bulbs, more will be sold and energy will be saved.

Speaking of saving energy, Honda continues to tout “Environmentology,” noting in their print ads that they are “the most fuel-efficient auto company in America.” I’m delighted to see them make such a claim and hope it sparks a war among the automakers to prove who can be the greenest. These are the kinds of war I can whole-heartedly support.

Recycled Paper Can Be Sexy

I’m a little behind on this one, but so is Victoria’s Secret. According to a Wall St. Journal story back in early December (I told you I was behind), Victoria’s Secret mails about 350 million catalogs a year and just recently decided to shift to paper that is either 10% “post-consumer waste” or has 10% of its content certified by the Forest Stewardship Council. The WSJ article first paragraph explains why Victoria’s Secret is suddenly seeing green:

After enduring protests by an environmental group over the past two years, Victoria’s Secret will stop using catalog paper made with pulp from a Canadian forest that is an important wildlife habitat and will move toward buying paper certified by a group that scrutinizes logging practices.

350 million catalogs a year and they are just now thinking about recycling paper? Holy melons, Batman, what have they been thinking about? It is a shame when companies don’t have the foresight to implement socially responsible behavior prior to being attacked. I think last week’s announcement (also in the Wall St. Journal) by top business CEO’s calling for caps on CO2 emissions was a smart preemptive move by big business to address a growing global problem. That said, once a company is caught napping on the sidelines, smart marketers seize the opportunity and embrace the issue with a vengeance. Wal-Mart has taken this approach with their “sustainability” and energy-conservation initiatives. Perhaps Victoria’s Secret will get pumped about recycling and ride the eco-friendly wave with the best of them. Maybe we all just need to give them a little tug.

Speaking of tugs, the folks behind this change of heart at Victoria Secret are ForestEthics, a group which developed a website called Victoria’s Dirty Secret (never underestimate the power of a few activists and a reasonably well-crafted website). This isn’t their first success either. In the last five years they’ve persuaded Williams-Sonoma, Dell and Staples to increase their use of recycled paper for catalogs. I imagine that the catalog managers at J. Crew, Sears and Lands’ End are examining their approach to paper a little more carefully right about now…

CMO = Create Magic Often

Yesterday I saw a number of high ranking CMOs discuss a host of hot marketing topics at the 2007 CMO Leadership Forum. While nary a speaker raised the notion of “doing well by doing good” many of the programs discussed fall into one or more categories of Marketing for Good. Here are a few highlights:

•Barnes and Noble was a pioneer in creating engaging retail brand experiences that according to their CMO, David Gitow, allow readers “to commune with literature” at their leisure. When challenged by an audience member that some people loiter for hours and never buy anything, Mr. Gitow ably defended Barnes and Noble’s engagement practice by noting how often he hears people say “I love Barnes and Noble” and that this kind of reverance is essentially money in the bank. Barnes and Noble has become a destination not just a book store, a place where parents take their kids, friends meet for coffee and others can just slip away into fantasy land.

•Russ Klein, President, Global Marketing, Strategy and Innovation at Burger King delivered one of the more inspiring presentations, demonstrating the rewards of serious risk taking. Recapping much of BK’s recent marketing activities from The King to Subservient Chicken, XBox games to the Whopperettes, Mr. Klein set up his presentation by noting that four years ago BK was known but unloved. (Side note: He made the case that “Have it Your Way” was an early salvo in the user-generated movement that has become the go to strategy of the last few years.) As a result of all their various efforts to entertain, engage, and occasionally offend, BK has become a beloved brand among their core 16-25 year-old target. Concurrent with all this clever marketing activity, BK enhanced its product offerings to the point that new products accounted for 18% of sales last year. They also made strides to improve their service quality. The bottom line: sales are up 20% and BK is loved by some (a lot of middle aged marketers shook their heads in contempt at Crispin’s brilliant but not for everyone BK work!). Seems like being “loved” goes straight to the bottom line.
•Allen Olivo of Yahoo showed several of the ways Yahoo is engaging a number of communities or “tribes” via its various web properties and marketing activities. He showed a great little video of how users of Flickr, Yahoo Groups and Yahoo Answers had had life changing experiences via their interactions with these sites. For example, one woman founded a group for parents of children with club feet and learned of a non-surgical way to help her child. Olivo also showed a very entertaining consumer-generated video by hard core Shakira fans.

•Deirdre Bigley of IBM walked us through IBM’s new venture into “branded journalism”. She showed us one of the works in progress which was a compelling video about the Real Time Crime Center IBM helped create for the NYPD. Her main point was that a good story like this could be re-purposed for any media (TV, online, presentations, print, etc.), and that IBM could shine without being the star. She noted that this type of branded content was not unlike the early days of television when sponsors created content like “soap operas” to carry their product messages. (While I think this approach won’t work for every client–it could certainly work for IBM given the amazing number of real human interest stories they are involved in from the RTCC to the Genome project.)

Before I close, I want to double-back to some of the operating principles Russ Klein threw out:

•Perfection is the enemy of good;

•Fail fast, succeed fast;

•Shed your skin frequently;

•Favor the provocative over the pleasant.

None of these are the prevailing wisdom of marketing and perhaps that it is exactly why Burger King is succeeding. Marketing for Good, with all its inherent virtue, is meaningless if the execution doesn’t cut through. Challenging convention and seeking innovative ways to connect with the target are fundamental to the cause.

Who Else Can Win?

Seems like a lot of folks out there are starting to think about the idea of “doing well by doing good”. In a recent post called “Who Else Can Win” on Mantra Brand Consulting’s blog, Jennifer Rice does a great job aggregating a number of MFG cases. The Jan/Feb 2007 issue of Business 2.0 cover story is a big bold “Go Green. Get Rich.” Even President Bush mentioned global warming and the need to reduce oil consumption in his State of the Union address after 6 years of silence on both of these subjects. So why is it that as Business 2.0 puts it “saving the planet has suddenly become good business?”

Perhaps businesses have finally embraced James Collins’ (author of Built to Last) notion of the “tyranny of the or.” Prevailing wisdom used to be that a company was either profitable OR eco-friendly, a low cost provider OR had fair employment practices, Companies like Chiquita Banana have discovered that removing the OR from those two formulas was not only a socially responsible idea but also a formula for growth (see Business 2.0 article on Chiquita). Regardless, enlightened self-interest is prevailing. Companies are seeing the wisdom of AND,
combining business goals and social goals.

I believe that there are really two key factors behind this trend. First and foremost, the risks of not being a good corporate citizen are greater than they have ever been. In the old days you could dump your chemicals in the river with little chance of the world finding out. Today you can’t drop your cigarette butt on the street without the risk of someone exposing you as a “litter butt” (see LitterButt.com). Do you something unlawful, stupid or even just a little annoying and someone will probably read about it on a blog like this and then 10 others bloggers will link to that blog and then the story will appear in national newspapers and next thing you know, the whole world knows about it. So yes, we have become an enormous self-policing society, making bloggers like me virtual sheriffs of sorts…
The second factor is that most markets are so competitive that being socially responsible can provide a short-term competitive advantage, helping to generate good will among customers, prospects, distributors and the media. The reason that I say short-term is that I think it is only a matter of time when being socially responsible becomes the price-of-entry in just about every category from cars to retail, food to manufacturing, travel to construction. Car companies must find ways to build more efficient cars or they will all loose share to Toyota. Retailers must find ways to build more efficient stores, pay their workers better, insist on buying goods from manufacturers with sustainable processes and fair labor practices, or they will all loose share to Wal-Mart.

Who else can win? All of us AND more.