So, What’s New?

Harry Truman is quoted as saying “there is nothing new in the world except the history you do not know.” Yesterday, I was reminded how true this is when I read a school paper about advertising that my mother-in-law wrote 75 year ago. I have posted it below because I thought you would enjoy it as much as I did and be astonished at the relevance of her comments to today’s advertising business despite all that’s happened in the last three quarters of a century.

Advertising (by Betty Becker, November 14, 1932)

A source of profit to the businessman, and a vocation employing thousands of men and women is that of advertising. People thus employed must have the ability to set forth advantage and special inducements of which their product offers, in such language that the public’s eye will be caught and its interest, desire or curiosity aroused. In short, advertisement has become an art. It may take any form from personal letters, magazines, and gifts of dollar bills, to the widely condemned, lofty billboards. The methods used to make products known to the world are as diverse as the products themselves.

Radio advertising, one of the latest and most profitable methods, can at times be very annoying, especially when a long, tiresome discourse interrupts entertainment. Everyone is also well aware of the disadvantages of the billboards, but there are instances where a colorful picture covers a dull spot in the city. One of the most beautiful advertising displays is the electric sign. While it may not yield a quick return, it is a source of pleasure to the onlooker. Nothing presents a gayer scene, or is more expressive of life and adventure than an avenue of bright lights.

On the whole, the people are the benefactors of this advertising business. The rivalry of radio-program sponsors can only tend to create a higher standard of entertainment in the field. Magazine advertisements are often composed of reproductions of paintings by famous artists, acquainting us with masterpieces of art. Great works of literature, too, become more familiar through allusions found in ads. The public has come to expect originality, better quality, and something of art and beauty in advertisements, and above all, advertisers expect huge profits in increased sales. Gladstone said, “Only a mint can make money without advertising.” Realizing the truth of this statement, advertisers seek to inform the public of their products in a manner which will appeal to it, and gain approval of intelligent people.

So when someone asks you “what’s new?” You can now respond with authority, “not much.” Advertising is a much of an art form today as it was 75 years ago. “Bright lights” still dazzle us from Times Square to Tokyo’s Ginza. The “rivalry” of program sponsors has arguably created a “higher standard of entertainment” if not simply a wealth of options. The public “has come to expect originality, higher quality and something of art” from advertising–consider for a moment how Superbowl advertising has become an event in and of itself. Most significantly to this blogger, Betty intuitively understood the notion of Marketing for Good, noting that advertising could not only yield “increased sales” but also be beneficial to “intelligent people” by engaging, enlightening and entertaining.

Something to Chew On

It’s late in the day and I frankly can’t decide if this campaign I just read about on Adfreak is simply hilarious or truly marketing for bad. Either way, rest assured this sucker is raising eyebrows from here to Sydney. The campaign for Mentos gum evidently broke several months ago in Australia and is indeed the most hated down under. I suspect it could achieve that status here as well. That said, I laughed a plenty watching a guy catching a Frisbee, pushing elevator buttons and even scratching records at a nightclub all with his with his Pinocchio-inspired nipples . Yeah, that’s right, the icy flavor of Mentos gum caused the guys nipples to grow to fairy tale proportions. Oh and don’t forget to check out the outdoor ad which offers a perky peak at his unusual protuberances.� It’s all in irresistible bad taste and I suppose that’s the point. Let me know your thoughts while I chew on this one a bit longer…

What’s Good?

Have been out of action for a couple of days watching the action at the Panasonic Open (AST Dew Tour) down in Baltimore. If you have never seen action sports in person, I highly recommend it especially if you kids. The sheer athleticism is astounding. On Friday, teen phenom, Ryan Sheckler, dazzled the crowd with his patented “Shecklair” move (and new tattoo) as he won the skateboarding park competition. On Saturday, Olympic gold winner Shaun White, showed why he is one of most versatile and talented athletes anywhere, skying high to victory in the skateboarding “Vert” half-pipe challenge. And on Sunday, Nate Adams death-defying flips on a 250 pound motorcycle proved once again that FMX (freestyle motocross) simply must be seen in person to be appreciated.

Being down there also alerted me to a new phrase among teens–”what’s good?” It’s the equivalent to “what’s up?” but far hipper. It came up as I was texting my teen daughter that my son and I were hangin’ with Ryan Sheckler at Circuit City (he was there on behalf of Renegade client Panasonic). Her response was “tell Ry what’s good.” Ryan was way too busy signing autographs for his adoring fans and fending off marriage proposals to tell me what’s good. Subsequently my daughter warned that if I were to use that phrase in public, she’d disown me (sorry Em). Nonetheless, the phrase “what’s good?” resonated as on-going issue for this blogger–case in point, a New York Times article today on Home Depot.

As I wrote about before, Home Depot has developed a designation for eco-friendly products it calls Eco Options. The article points out that it is not always easy to tell “what’s good” as so many marketers try to jump on the green gravy train.

“In somebody’s mind, the products they were selling us were environmentally friendly,” said Ron Jarvis, a Home Depot senior vice president who oversees the Eco Options program. But not in his mind.

“Most of what you see today in the green movement is voodoo marketing,” he added. “If they say their product makes the sky bluer and the grass greener, that’s just not good enough.”

By the standards of Mr. Jarvis — who fertilizes his own home garden with a liquefied worm waste product packaged in recycled soda bottles and fills his swimming pool with salt water to avoid putting chlorine into the environment — only 2,500 of the products made the cut.

That’s out of 176,000 products that Home Depot sells and 60,000 that tried to qualify. Since sales of Eco Options are up 10% since the program launched in April, Home Depot can expect lots of pressure from their suppliers to gain this designation. Home Depot will need to fend off this pressure in order for the program to maintain its integrity. (NOTE: Eco Options is one of the few programs out there providing quantifiable evidence that promoting green is in fact Marketing for Good; doing good for the brand and hopefully the world.)

As other marketers seek growth by turning green, they should do so with as much integrity as they can muster. False claims of greenness will inevitably be “outed” and the claimant suitably pummeled by blogging watchdogs. Standards are being developed in various categories and marketers will need to meet/exceed these or work with their industry to develop better ones. With so much green to be had by going green, the risks of “voodoo marketing” need to be severe. We consumers should have no doubt as to “what’s good?”

The Green Revolution is Upon Us

Suddenly the old cliche, there are no problems only opportunities, sounds downright brilliant to me. The dire problem of climate change has created perhaps the biggest business opportunity of the 21st century. Like it or not, the Green Revolution is upon us creating a surprisingly sustainable win-win scenario for businesses and the world we share.

The evidence for the Green Revolution is everywhere. GE announced it generated $12 billion in sales of green related technologies and expects to increase that $20 billion in just three years. Hybrid cars, though still a tiny fraction of the automotive industry, are gaining traction as every automaker rolls out is latest iteration (and not so coincidentally it looks like Hummer2 is going off-road for good). Architects everywhere are rolling out blueprints for greener homes and buildings (witness New York Times Magazine article on eco-tecture). Wal-Mart is working with all its suppliers to reduce packaging waste forcing companies like P&G and Unilever to concentrate on concentrate. VC’s and investment banks are gathering up mounds of funds to fuel the revolution and make more green along the way. For example, JP Morgan is setting up an alternative energy investment banking unit. Cities like San Jose and Austin are fighting to prove they have the best infrastructure to support green businesses. Designers in New York (o2NYC.org) and around the world (o2.org) are gathering to do their part.

No government, non-profit or business enterprise can afford to ignore the problem and many are clamoring to be the first with solutions. Ambitious politicians like NYC’s Bloomberg and California’s Schwarzenegger are gaining political capital by announcing ambitious green agendas. Non-profits supporting various green causes are sprouting daily and existing ones are looking for ways to make their operations greener. Public companies can expect shareholders to ask about their green plans and can count on the media to play watchdog as the plans unfold. In many rapidly growing service sectors like management consulting and web production, a strong green push will help curry favor with customers and help attract the best and brightest recruits. College grads across the country are now signing a “sustainability pledge” (hopefully on recycled paper) and undoubtedly will align themselves with enlightened green employers.

Marketing for Good is prepared to champion anyone who makes green by being green themselves or helping others to be green. We have a lot to do in short period of time and perhaps the same free market that caused this mess can be the means to cleaning it up. For example, the Wall Street Journal article recently reported that the southern oceans are losing their ability to absorb carbon dioxide which is a big problem since they currently absorb about 15% of the world’s excess CO2. If the oceans stop absorbing extra CO2, global warming will accelerate even faster. Entrepreneurs to the rescue? According to a June Business 2.0 article a couple of enterprising start-ups, Climos and Planktos, are attacking this problem directly by enabling carbon-sucking algae to bloom and fueling their growth by trading carbon credits. I’ll let the scientist debate the merits of this approach and simply offer it as one of many examples of how saving the world could be the biggest business opportunity of all time.

Let there be no doubt that the Green Revolution is upon us. According to a Corporate Social Responsibility Manager at HP, some companies are even contemplating the creation of a Chief Environmental Officer to champion green initiatives. Soon, being green will simply be the price of entry in just about every category. Soon. Until then, you have a little time to get your corporate green house in order for the good of your company, your employees, your shareholders and last but not least, the world we share.

Car Crash

Talking about popping your own tires– this story blows my mind.  Brandweek reported this week that the auto industry is fighting proposed legislation to increase auto mileage:

The auto industry takes on the government beginning this weekend with an ad campaign that warns consumers that proposed increases in fuel standards would drive up the price of vehicles.

The series of radio spots and print ads, via Glover Park Group, Washington, will run in ten states. The ads also state that a Senate bill that would impose a requirement that automakers raise fuel economy by 40% by 2020 would make drivers less safe because automakers would have to build smaller cars in order to conform to the mandate.

This is Marketing for Bad in all its tire screeching glory.  The industry is simply asking for ridicule.  Are you telling the American consumer that the same country that put men on the moon and created the Chia Pet can’t figure out how to increase auto mileage by 40% in 13 years.  Heck, we should be able to figure out how to build Jetson-style solar-powered flying cars in 13 years. Instead of fighting this legislation, Detroit should invite the entire engineering world to help the auto makers to solve the mileage problem in a collaborative, totally transparent, Linux-like (open standards) movement. Engineers, like computer geeks, love this kind of challenge.  And if Detroit can’t solve the problem they can better start learning Japanese because I have no doubt Toyota will figure it out.

So, happy motoring this holiday weekend. Drive safe. Use your cruise control to optimize your mileage. And if you happen to hear one of Detroit’s anti-fuel standards ads, honk your disapproval.  Better yet, send them a note when you finally get out of the bad city air and into the country.

Do You Know the Way?

If we are what we eat, cities can be defined by the businesses they host. Buffalo is still trying to shake the reputation it earned from all the local manufacturers that polluted Lake Erie (by the way Lake Erie is now one of the cleanest lakes in the country).  The Wall St. Journal reported reported today that several US cities including San Jose and Austin are vying to be the home for “clean technology” companies. These cities clearly see the competitive advantage they could gain by hosting a concentration of companies focused on making the world a little greener. The Journal noted:

San Jose, considered the capital of Silicon Valley as home to high-tech bellwethers such as Cisco Systems Inc., eBay Inc. and Adobe Inc., is trying to reinvent itself as a center for clean tech — and in the process is providing a glimpse of where the Silicon Valley economy may evolve next. While the region has long been a cradle for high tech, the area has in the past 18 months become fixated on investing in clean-tech companies. In 2006, North American venture-capital investment in this sector soared to $2.9 billion from $1.6 billion a year earlier, according to the Cleantech Venture Network, an industry group.

Whether or not San Jose officials are doing this out of concern for the environment or simply because they think it can improve the tax base of their fair city, this concerted effort to attract “clean technology” companies qualifies as Marketing for Good. The result of their efforts will ultimately be good for their city and the world they share.  Seems to me more and more companies will soon know the good way to you know where.